Confessions and Admissions

EVER since the terms "confession and admission" were coined for evidentiary use, courts have attempted to draw clear distinctions between them, and all too frequently, judicial opinions have mirrored slavish obedience to the authority of mechanical definitions. For the sake of clarity, a succinct, well-put definition may serve a utilitarian purpose in establishing ready comprehension of a segment of human experience, but, when detached from actual fact, and the many variables that fact situations produce, this same definition may stifle the imagination and inhibit appreciation of practical considerations. Stock definitions of admissions and confessions lead one to believe that the distinguishing characteristics are sharply outlined, and if one were to accept this impression as an absolute verity, problems of admissibility would rarely beg solution. It may be unfortunate that experience dictates otherwise, but it will readily be seen that a workable rule of admissibility will require...